Depositions are an integral part of gathering information in legal cases. They allow attorneys to ask questions and collect evidence from witnesses. Our adversarial court system relies on opposing parties gathering competitive evidence. To ensure fair competition, improper influence on witnesses and obstructive tactics during discovery should be prohibited. These rules help maintain the integrity and fairness of the legal process.
A key part of a lawyer's role is preparing a witness to testify and giving guidance. According to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, not properly preparing a witness can be an ethical violation. However, there are limits to what is allowed during witness preparation. With the rise of remote technologies, it has become easier for some lawyers to unethically coach witnesses in hidden ways, making it crucial to define what is acceptable and what crosses the line in witness preparation.
Misconduct during depositions can cause serious problems for everyone involved. It can lead to delays, increased costs, and even affect the outcome of a case.
What is Deposition Misconduct?
Deposition misconduct can take several forms, disrupting the legal process and hindering the search for truth. Winking at a witness during trial, kicking a deponent under the table, or passing notes and whispering to a witness mid-testimony are clear examples of improper attempts to influence a witness's ongoing testimony.
In addition, the following are examples of classic deposition misconduct:
Obstructive Behavior. This includes actions like excessive objections, instructing a witness not to answer without proper grounds, and coaching witnesses. For example, an attorney might repeatedly object to questions, disrupt the flow of information, or suggest answers to the witness during the deposition.
Offensive Conduct. This involves personal attacks, harassment, or intimidation tactics. Such behavior creates a hostile environment and can make witnesses reluctant to provide truthful answers. Examples include using derogatory language, threatening, or engaging in aggressive questioning.
Improper Instructions. Beyond what not to say in a deposition, improper instructions occur when an attorney directs a witness not to answer questions without valid reasons, such as incorrectly claiming privilege; this tactic is often used to shield damaging information and can significantly impede discovery.
Private Consultations. Attorneys are generally not allowed to privately talk with witnesses during a deposition between a question and an answer, except to determine if a privilege applies. However, conversations during regular breaks or at adjournment are allowed unless the court prohibits them.
Coaching. The line between proper witness preparation and unethical influence, often called coaching, can be blurry. This is due to the ethical obligations to represent a client and avoid improperly influencing witnesses. Terms like horse shedding, woodshedding, or sandpapering describe this unethical practice. Model Rule 3.4(b) explicitly prohibits lawyers from advising or assisting any witness, client or not, in giving false testimony.
What Are the Rules Governing Depositions?
Several rules govern the conduct of depositions, designed to ensure fairness and order. Understanding these rules helps maintain the integrity of the legal process.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
Rule 30 of the FRCP outlines what is expected during depositions, including handling objections and when a witness may be instructed not to answer. These rules ensure that depositions are conducted to promote the discovery of relevant information while protecting the rights of all parties involved.
Local Court Rules
In addition to the FRCP, many jurisdictions have specific rules governing deposition conduct. These rules are designed to address regional practices and supplement federal guidelines. For example, local rules may restrict the objections raised during a deposition.
Washington State Specific Rules
In Washington State, the rules for depositions align with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) but also include specific state-level regulations.
Washington courts emphasize the importance of fair play and have additional provisions to ensure that depositions are conducted without undue delay or obstruction. For example, according to Washington RPC 3.4(a) and (c), a lawyer must not unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or assist another person in knowingly disobeying court rules, except for an open refusal based on the assertion that no valid obligation exists.
Understanding these specific rules is crucial for attorneys practicing in Washington to avoid pitfalls and ensure compliance. The rules for depositions mix procedural and professional guidelines. They focus on preventing improper coaching of witnesses and unnecessary interruptions.
Lawyers can only object to questions that are privileged or beyond the scope of discovery. Objections must be brief and not suggest answers. Lawyers should not interrupt with arguments. During a deposition, lawyers should not privately talk to witnesses between questions and answers unless it is to check for privilege. Conversations during regular breaks are allowed unless the court forbids it. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c) echoes these points, emphasizing that objections should be concise and non-argumentative.
Washington RPC 3.4 also prohibits obstructing access to evidence and requires following court rules, while RPC 8.4(d) forbids conduct that harms the justice process. These rules are in place because depositions should be fair and free from misconduct.
What Are the Risks of Deposition Misconduct?
Engaging in deposition misconduct carries significant risks for attorneys and their clients; these risks can affect the outcome of a case and have long-term professional consequences.
Legal Sanctions
Courts have the authority to impose sanctions on attorneys or parties who engage in deposition misconduct. Sanctions can range from monetary fines to more severe measures, such as dismissing claims or excluding evidence. For example, an attorney might face fines and be barred from further participation in the deposition process due to repeated obstructive behavior.
Reputational Damage
Misconduct can severely harm an attorney's reputation. It impacts their professional standing and future case outcomes. An attorney known for engaging in misconduct may find it difficult to gain the trust of clients and colleagues, leading to long-term career consequences.
Adverse Legal Outcomes
Deposition misconduct can result in unfavorable legal rulings. For instance, a court might exclude critical evidence or testimony obtained through improper means, weakening a party's case and jeopardizing its chances of success; this can be particularly damaging in high-stakes litigation, where every piece of evidence is crucial.
Understanding misconduct risks underscores the importance of proper deposition conduct and professionalism.
What Are the Remedies and Preventative Measures for Deposition Misconduct?
Addressing deposition misconduct promptly is vital to maintaining the fairness of the legal process. The following are some remedies and preventative measures:
Motions for Protective Orders
Attorneys can file motions for protective orders to limit or prevent specific questions or conduct during a deposition; this proactive measure helps maintain order and fairness. For example, a protective order might restrict certain lines of questioning deemed irrelevant or overly intrusive.
Court Intervention
During a deposition, immediate court intervention can be sought to halt misconduct and provide relief; this approach is particularly effective in addressing severe or ongoing issues. Courts can issue orders to stop inappropriate behavior and ensure that the deposition proceeds smoothly.
Post-Deposition Sanctions
After a deposition, parties can seek sanctions through motions detailing the misconduct and its impact on the proceedings; this can deter future misconduct and hold the offending party accountable. For instance, a court might order financial penalties or other corrective actions against an attorney found guilty of misconduct.
Implementing clear measures can help ensure that depositions are conducted fairly and professionally, minimizing disruptions and preserving the integrity of the legal process.
What Are the Best Practices for Attorneys to Prevent Deposition Misconduct?
The following are some key strategies to remedy deposition misconduct:
Video Recording the Deposition
Recording a deposition on video can discourage improper behavior and provide a clearer record if issues arise; this is particularly effective when an attorney is prone to coaching witnesses improperly since a court could request to view a recorded deposition.
Preparation and Education
Thorough preparation and a deep understanding of deposition rules are essential to preventing misconduct. Adequate preparation of a witness is a cornerstone of thoroughness and competence, as required by Model Rule 1.1.
To avoid deposition misconduct, lawyers can take the following steps:
Remind the witness they will be under oath.
Stress the importance of honesty, including saying "I do not recall" when applicable.
Explain the case strategy, testimonial process, and purpose of the deposition.
Suggest appropriate attire and demeanor.
Provide context for the testimony.
Discuss the witness's likely testimony and memory.
Identify expected testimony from others and compare it with the witness's version of events.
Review documents or physical evidence with the witness to refresh their memory.
Identify lines of questioning and potential cross-examination.
Suggest precise wording to ensure the witness's meaning is understood.
Advise the witness to listen to the entire question before answering.
Emphasize the importance of staying calm and avoiding arguments with the questioning lawyer.
Instruct the witness to testify only about what they know and remember, avoiding guesses or speculation.
Encourage the witness to focus on answering the question asked without volunteering extra information.
Attorneys should familiarize themselves with the relevant rules and procedures and ensure their clients and witnesses are well-prepared. It is important to understand the types of permissible questions and how to respond appropriately.
Clear Communication
Lawyers must set clear expectations with clients and witnesses about appropriate behavior during depositions. Attorneys should explain the importance of professionalism and the potential consequences of misconduct. Effective communication ensures everyone understands their roles and responsibilities during the deposition.
Professional Conduct
Maintaining professionalism and respect during depositions is vital. Attorneys should remain calm and composed, even in challenging situations, to prevent conflicts from escalating; this approach fosters a cooperative environment and facilitates the discovery process. Tips for maintaining professionalism include avoiding personal attacks, focusing on relevant questions, and handling objections properly.
By following best practices, attorneys can conduct depositions more effectively, minimize misconduct risk, and contribute to a fairer legal process. If you have questions about depositions or need professional court reporting services, consider contacting experienced providers who can offer support and guidance.
Contact NAEGELI Deposition & Trial Today
The Leaders in Depositions and Legal Support for Washington
Since 1980, court reporting and litigation support have evolved significantly. At NAEGELI Deposition & Trial, we stay ahead by using the most current technology to provide accurate and efficient services.
With services such as court reporting, trial presentation, videography, interpreters, and remote depositions, our expertise and experience helps attorneys avoid unethical practices in depositions by offering reliable and professional support. Our advanced copying and scanning services turn large volumes of paper into secure, searchable digital files, meeting rigorous compliance standards like HIPAA.
We consistently adopt the latest technologies, ensuring our clients benefit from streamlined legal processes and communication. NAEGELI Deposition & Trial is committed to excellence and innovation. Our professionals are ready to support your legal needs with top-tier services to help Washington lawyers stay within the rules of professional responsibility.
Contact our in-house support team at (800) 528-3335, use our chat feature, or email us. To book our services, click SCHEDULE NOW at the top of the page.